Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘LMS’ Category

Another great post from Lisa M. Lane shows us how to use the Blackboard LMS to administrate a college online course while using outside Learning 2.0 tools (blogs, wikis) we want to use for teaching. Blackboard is still a very popular LMS for the administration of college online courses.

Read Full Post »

Ignatia posted:
Thanks to the great College 2.0 community started by Eduardo Peirano, I could read a post by Alejandra Pickett that really blew my mind. The way she build her course is a great example of using several web tools, external to the Moodle Course Management System , to enhance an online course.

Read Full Post »

In addition to a counterintuitive organizational scheme, integrated commercial systems have a built-in pedagogy, evident in the easiest-to-use, most accessible features. The focus on presentation (written documents to read), complemented by basic “discussion” input from students, is based on traditional lecture, review, and test pedagogy. This orientation is very different from the development of [...]

Read Full Post »

Course management systems, by virtue of their intent and design, create limitations on faculty independence of instruction. Since such systems are simply products marketed to institutions in order to integrate resources, they are the equivalent of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems and thus reflect a move toward standardization as a way to ease [...]

Read Full Post »

Moving towards a PLE from the current model in which formal learning is very thoroughly entrenched in Learning Management systems will require considerable evolution of ideas and technologies and adoption of innovation. Innovation guru Everett Rogers noted that relative advantage is the largest factor in the adoption of innovations. Of course the relative advantage [...]

Read Full Post »

A few years ago, I got into a polite discussion with an administrator about the necessity of the college supporting a variety of Course Management Systems, rather than restricting faculty to only one CMS. At the time, I was pretty naive. I assumed that anyone with any sense would realize that the freedom of faculty [...]

Read Full Post »

The views of faculty, students, and administrators regarding the advantages and shortcomings of current L/CMSs fell into three key areas: compatibility and interoperability, usability, and smartness/dumbness.
In envisioning a future e-learning environment, the stakeholders—faculty, students, and administrators—talked about desired features in the areas of smart systems, environment, archives and storage, multi-modal/multimedia communication channels, collaboration tools, and [...]

Read Full Post »

How has the implementation of a CMS (Blackboard) impacted students and faculty at the university? What are the benefits and challenges from supporting this tool on an institution-wide basis? Our findings conclude that instructors and students are moderately satisfied with the course management tool, but only if it is stable. However, for all of [...]

Read Full Post »

Certain learning tasks are well suited for an LMS (centralized functions like learner administration and content management). Learning itself is different – it is not a process to be managed. Learning is by nature multi-faceted and chaotic. Organizations that now lock into enterprise-level systems will be able to do an excellent job of delivering [...]

Read Full Post »

Adina Sullivan asked at the Classroom 2.0 Forum where to direct colleagues who don’t know where to start using web based tools with students.
My recommendation was:
I would start by introducing faculty and students to del.icio.us. I think it wouldn’t be so difficult for them to understand this tool, since they [...]

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »